What does judicial activism advocate for?

• A. A passive role for courts in political matters
• B. An active role in policy-making and protection of rights
• C. Strict adherence to the Constitution
• D. Limiting judicial power

Answer: (B)

Judicial activism advocates for an active role in policy-making and the protection of rights. This approach suggests that judges should interpret laws and the Constitution in a way that considers contemporary social issues and values, rather than strictly adhering to the original intent or the literal wording of legal texts. Advocates of judicial activism argue that the courts should not only interpret the law but also actively shape public policy and ensure that the rights of individuals are upheld, particularly in cases involving social justice, civil rights, and other important societal issues. This philosophy stands in contrast to more restraining views that prioritize a limited role for the judiciary in political matters or emphasize a more literal interpretation of the Constitution.